翻訳と辞書 |
Pendergrast v Chapman : ウィキペディア英語版 | Pendergrast v Chapman
Pendergrast v Chapman () 2 NZLR 177 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the consequences of cancellation of a contract under the Contractual Remedies Act 1979. ==Background== Chapman agreed to purchase the Pendergrast's Epsom property for $650,000, $40,000 of the deposit to be paid via a post dated cheque. The post dated cheque later dishonoured, and as a result, Pendergrast cancelled the contract and sued Chapman for the $40,000 unpaid deposit. Chapman defended the claim that under the section 8(3) of the Contractual Remedies Act, once a contract is cancelled, neither party is obliged to perform the contract any further.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Pendergrast v Chapman」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|